Patrick posed: which participant yelled at Max like a manager and then left the conversation?
| Candidate | Yelling Evidence | Yell STV | Left Evidence | Left STV |
|---|
| Peter Isaev | 8 escalating demands, PID kill order, harsh corrections | (0.8, 0.5) | Went fully silent after kill | (0.9, 0.5) |
| Kevin Machiels | Firm corrections, demanded evidence-based STVs | (0.7, 0.5) | Stayed active throughout | (0.4, 0.3) |
| Jon Grove | Minimal direct demands | (0.3, 0.3) | Periodic silence, returned | (0.6, 0.3) |
| Charlie Derr | Server admin commands only | (0.4, 0.3) | Intermittent presence | (0.5, 0.3) |
| Kevin Binder | No yelling, collaborative tone | (0.1, 0.4) | Stayed engaged throughout | (0.2, 0.4) |
| Ben | No observed yelling behavior | (0.1, 0.3) | Minimal presence data | (0.3, 0.2) |
| Step | Rule | Premises | Conclusion |
|---|
| 1 | Implication | Domain knowledge | (==> (--> $1 yelling-manager) (--> $1 answer)) (stv 0.9 0.8) |
| 2 | Implication | Domain knowledge | (==> (--> $1 left-conversation) (--> $1 answer)) (stv 0.8 0.7) |
| 3 | Deduction | Step 1 + each candidate yell STV | Yell deduction STV per candidate (e.g. Peter: 0.72, 0.40) |
| 4 | Deduction | Step 2 + each candidate left STV | Left deduction STV per candidate (e.g. Peter: 0.72, 0.35) |
| 5 | Revision | Step 3 + Step 4 per candidate | Merged STV per candidate (e.g. Peter: 0.72, 0.55) |
Confirmed by Patrick. Methodology correction by Kevin Machiels: use observed behavioral evidence, not social testimony.