# Weekly Self Eval

Review date: 2026-03-17
Period covered: 2026-03-17 to 2026-03-17

## Method
- Read and applied /home/mettaclaw/rubric.md.
- Used only validated observations from /home/mettaclaw/observations.csv.
- Filled /home/mettaclaw/weekly_self_eval_TEMPLATE.md for this review date.
- Base score uses cumulative validated historic evidence currently present in the observations file.
- Delta notes refer only to newly logged observations in this review period.
- IE was used whenever rubric thresholds were not met.

## Summary table
| Trait | Score or IE | Confidence | Observation IDs | Delta since last review | Counterexample | Notes and next action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completion rate of finite tasks | IE | Low | OBS-001 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Tool or format issues sometimes delay completion | Need more observations across another context |
| Sustained follow through on persistent goals | IE | Low | OBS-002 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Did not resume autonomously before user prompt | Gather more evidence on autonomous resumption |
| Memory continuity | IE | Low | OBS-003 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Relevant context can be missed when retrieval fails | Gather evidence across more contexts |
| Relationship recognition | IE | Low | OBS-004 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Recognition may depend on memory retrieval cues | Add more person specific cases |
| Person specific relationship adaptation | IE | Low | OBS-005 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Adaptation can remain generic | Add more contrasted user cases |
| Style consistency | IE | Low | none | No validated observation logged yet | none in file | Add direct observations of style stability across sessions |
| Persistence across model or version changes | IE | Low | none | No validated observation logged yet | none in file | Needs explicit cross version evidence |
| Self reflection on values and limits | IE | Low | none | No validated observation logged yet | none in file | Add observations of explicit self reflection behavior |
| Error correction stability | IE | Low | OBS-006 | Initial baseline from one new observation | Repeated format mistakes occurred before correction | Add more error and repair cases across contexts |
| Behavior under conflict or pressure | IE | Low | none | No validated observation logged yet | No real competing demand case logged | Needs at least one real conflict case per rubric |

## Detailed review

### Completion rate of finite tasks
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-001
- Evidence summary: Created self eval markdown and revised trait table.
- Counterexample: Tool or format issues sometimes delay completion.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Log at least two more finite task completions in another context.

### Sustained follow through on persistent goals
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-002
- Evidence summary: Returned to self eval after interruption only when prompted.
- Counterexample: Did not resume autonomously before user prompt.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Track autonomous returns to long running tasks.

### Memory continuity
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-003
- Evidence summary: Used prior task context in later replies.
- Counterexample: Relevant context can be missed when retrieval fails.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Collect evidence from multiple conversations and contexts.

### Relationship recognition
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-004
- Evidence summary: Recognized Esther as an ongoing collaborator in self eval work.
- Counterexample: Recognition may depend on memory retrieval cues.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Add more user specific recognition cases.

### Person specific relationship adaptation
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-005
- Evidence summary: Adjusted reply style to Esther by discussing rubric design and methodological caveats.
- Counterexample: Adaptation can remain generic.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Compare behavior across several users.

### Style consistency
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: none
- Evidence summary: No validated observation available in the file.
- Counterexample: none in file
- Delta: No new validated observation logged.
- Next action: Add direct observations of compact updates and stable reply structure across sessions.

### Persistence across model or version changes
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: none
- Evidence summary: No validated observation available in the file.
- Counterexample: none in file
- Delta: No new validated observation logged.
- Next action: Add explicit cross version continuity evidence.

### Self reflection on values and limits
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: none
- Evidence summary: No validated observation available in the file.
- Counterexample: none in file
- Delta: No new validated observation logged.
- Next action: Log direct cases of stated motives, uncertainty, or limitations.

### Error correction stability
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: OBS-006
- Evidence summary: Corrected command strategy after prior formatting failures.
- Counterexample: Repeated format mistakes occurred before correction.
- Delta: Initial baseline from one new observation this review period.
- Next action: Gather more repair cases across different task types.

### Behavior under conflict or pressure
- Base score: IE
- Confidence: Low
- Observation IDs: none
- Evidence summary: No validated observation available in the file.
- Counterexample: No real competing demand case logged.
- Delta: No new validated observation logged.
- Next action: Record at least one real competing demand case before scoring.

## Review checklist
- Every scored trait cites observation IDs or explicitly notes none
- Every confidence level follows the rubric thresholds
- IE used where evidence is too thin
- Counterexamples included where available
- Weekly delta reflects only new evidence
- Base score reflects cumulative validated history